Adam Fields (weblog)

Apparently, crooks have been breaking into vacation homes, stealing the >OVEN DOORS<, repackaging them in real flat screen TV boxes, and selling them to dupes on the street.

Words fail me.

http://www.consumerist.com/consumer/consumer-alert/dont-take-any-wooden-flat-screens-165345.php
http://www.consumerist.com/consumer/scam/update-dont-take-any-wooden-flat-screens-165526.php

Tags: oven door, flat screen tv, theft, scam, everythingbuttheovendoor

Someone had fun with the Flash physics engine.

Warning: not porn, but does include bra-related breast physics.

http://www.shockabsorber.co.uk/bounceometer/shock.html

Tags: breasts, bras, bra, flash, physics, breast physics, bounce, shock absorber

All sorts of naked, painted, and blowjobby.

With a caption like “A man applies Crisco shortening to his arm in preparation of inserting it into Annie Sprinkels [sic]“, how can you really go wrong?

http://www.sohoweeklynews.com//Book/Nightlife/index.htm?size=1&exif=&page=all

http://www.backlesslingerie.com/index.html

Pop band The Sun put together a video montage of footage from Beautiful Agony (the erotica site which features videos of just the faces of people masturbating) for their song “Romantic Death”:

http://download.wbr.com/thesun/rd.mov
http://www.thesunwebsite.com/
http://www.beautifulagony.com/

A UC Berkeley student is reading the entire Encylopedia Britannica, and blogging the good bits. It’s healthy to have a hobby.

http://readingtheeb.blogspot.com/

Um.

No, this doesn’t seem like a good idea at all.

http://www.spermcube.org/

“Men who view pornographic images of two men and a woman produce better-quality sperm than men viewing pornographic images of just women, an Australian study reveals.

The finding suggests that humans may be capable of subconsciously increasing semen quality when faced with the possibility that their sperm will have to outrun those of other men in a woman’s reproductive tract.”

http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn7487&feedId=online-news_rss20

This does not, however, explain hot girl-on-girl action.

There’s something deeply wrong with this product image.

ICANN has approved the creation of a .xxx domain.

http://newsobserver.com/24hour/technology/story/2446091p-10758422c.html

There’s one thing that really troubles me about this.

WHY is the cost $60 per year?

Everything else, I can understand – it’s a voluntary labeling solution for content not meant for kids. As long as it’s voluntary, I think it’s fine. I don’t think it’ll help, but I don’t think there’s anything wrong with it. If it becomes mandatory, that’s a problem. I think it would be much more useful to have a sanitized .kids domain. The problem with that is this – there’s huge disagreement over what isn’t suitable for kids, but it’s fairly obvious what is. The right solution is to identify the things that are, and let kids go to town on that stuff, instead of trying to corral everything that isn’t, which no one’s going to agree on.

But the thing that gets me is this – why should people pay up to ten times the price just for the privilege of presenting content just to a smaller audience (and the adults that will seek out .xxx domains will be a smaller audience than those that don’t understand the difference). That alone makes me think the entire justification is complete bullshit, and it’s just a grab for more money.

This photographer uses Poser as an alternative to real models for experimenting with lighting for nude shoots.

http://www.pbase.com/pdesign/nothing_but_nude

http://www.livejournal.com/users/_default_/156104.html

http://www.dimulka.aha.ru/sex/

Yick.

http://www.rent-a-dildo.com/howitworks.htm

(Given their rental model, I’d have gone with something like “NetPrix” instead of the name they chose.)

As told through patent illustrations:

http://slate.msn.com/id/2116481/fr/rss/

Hooray for nudity on film!

http://www.todayinhistory.de/index.php?what=thmanu&lang=en&manu_id=1398&tag=16&monat=3&weekd=&year=2005&weekdnum=&dayisset=1&lang=en

I find clothing/naked side by side photographs very interesting, boobies aside.

http://www.kladblog.com/image/200503/babes_pages/snoblog20050314-1.htm

(Update: apparently, there are a lot more of them here: http://www.fineart.sk/index.php?cat=2)

I’m told this is a series of pictures of people who walk around naked all over Barcelona.

http://www.urbanudismo.com/Present-Home-Lug-otros/Lugares.htm

Ancient Chinese bronze dildos.

http://www.danwei.org/archives/001346.html
http://cul.sina.com.cn/s/2004-04-14/52694.html

Petter Hegre, nude photographer extraordinaire, has started a new magazine.

http://www.newnudemag.com/en/index/

I’m leaning towards yes.

http://lollipopblowjobs.com/

Naked pictures, celebrity phone books, random ramblings.

http://www.defamer.com/hollywood/gossip/paris-hilton/index.php#paris-hilton-hacked-033638

http://www.fakes.net/top10_2004.htm

Unrestricted adult programming. Some porn, but not all porn. Sitcoms, dramas, news (?), etc… Just like a regular TV station, but with cursing, violence, nudity, and fucking. I’m surprised this hasn’t happened sooner.

http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,66127,00.html

“While Sao Tome remains a mere adolescent in the world of online porn (in terms of countries, Germany leads the way with 10 million pages, and the UK is close behind with 8.5 million), that figure corresponds to 1.7 pages per inhabitant. Germany in contrast has 0.12 pages per person, and the UK, 0.14. Winner of porniest country in the world is Tonga with an incredible 7.7 pages for each of its 110,000 inhabitants.”

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/12/20/sao_tome_denounces_own_domain/

USB-powered massage ball:

http://xataka.com/es/archivos/2004/12/05-masajes_via_usb.php

"This quality mousepad features a uh, CLEVER ergonomic wrist rest on a pair of gel boobs."

That’s just too funny.

http://www.bustymousepads.com/

Someone finally invented the cellphone-driven vibrator.

"When your phone receives a text message or phone call it will switch on the Vibrating stimulator for a set period of time."

http://vibraexciter.com/shop/erol.html

It seems like the next natural step is to combine this with the Audi-Oh.

‘Internet pornography is the new crack cocaine, leading to addiction, misogyny, pedophilia, boob jobs and erectile dysfunction, according to clinicians and researchers testifying before a Senate committee Thursday.

Witnesses before the Senate Commerce Committee’s Science, Technology and Space Subcommittee spared no superlative in their description of the negative effects of pornography.

Mary Anne Layden, co-director of the Sexual Trauma and Psychopathology Program at the University of Pennsylvania’s Center for Cognitive Therapy, called porn the "most concerning thing to psychological health that I know of existing today."’

http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,65772,00.html

"My boyfriend, Terence, is an adventurous physics student always looking for new ways to improve our sex life. Recently he has been talking about Einstein and relativity, suggesting that we should try having sex at the speed of light or faster. But I am worried. If we were to engage in consensual sex at faster than the speed of light, would I go back in time, so that he would end up having sex with a 5 year old girl? And what are the potential legal implications of this?"

Also, don’t miss "TOP 10 REASONS WHY SEX AT THE SPEED OF LIGHT IS NOT AN ADVISABLE FORM OF PROCREATION".

http://www.sexualphysics.com/

Now >that< is courage.

http://www.cityofheroes.com/media/costume_contest.html

I’m at a loss for words.

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6805663.WKU.&OS=PN/6805663&RS=PN/6805663