http://www.aquick.org/blog/2006/01/25/tim-wu-article-on-google-and-search-engine-privacy/ entertaining hundreds of millions of eyeball atoms every day Sun, 12 Aug 2012 17:06:22 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://www.aquick.org/blog/2006/01/25/tim-wu-article-on-google-and-search-engine-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-632 adam Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:35:29 +0000 http://www.aquick.org/blog/2006/01/25/tim-wu-article-on-google-and-search-engine-privacy/#comment-632 But that's not the question being asked here. Suppose the coffee shop had a security camera outside, facing the porn store down the street, but which conveniently covered the entire street, including a doctor's office, abortion clinic, and Mosque (yes, it's a busy street). Suppose no crime was committed on that street but the government wanted to pass a law making every porn store have a bouncer at the front door to keep kids from entering. Would it be unreasonable for the coffee shop to hand over a week's worth of tapes for the doctor's office, abortion clinic, and Mosque so the government could see if any kids went into the shop? But that’s not the question being asked here. Suppose the coffee shop had a security camera outside, facing the porn store down the street, but which conveniently covered the entire street, including a doctor’s office, abortion clinic, and Mosque (yes, it’s a busy street). Suppose no crime was committed on that street but the government wanted to pass a law making every porn store have a bouncer at the front door to keep kids from entering. Would it be unreasonable for the coffee shop to hand over a week’s worth of tapes for the doctor’s office, abortion clinic, and Mosque so the government could see if any kids went into the shop?

]]> http://www.aquick.org/blog/2006/01/25/tim-wu-article-on-google-and-search-engine-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-631 Marty Wed, 25 Jan 2006 17:49:53 +0000 http://www.aquick.org/blog/2006/01/25/tim-wu-article-on-google-and-search-engine-privacy/#comment-631 Suppose the coffee shop had a security camera outside, facing up the street. Suppose a crime was committed on that street, and the police asked the coffee shop for a copy of the tape from a certain day. Would it be so unreasonable for them to comply? Suppose the coffee shop had a security camera outside, facing up the street.
Suppose a crime was committed on that street, and the police asked the coffee shop for a copy of the tape from a certain day.
Would it be so unreasonable for them to comply?

]]>